Computational geometry is a branch of computer science that has been extensively studied in areas like graphics and GIS. Today, we will explore polygon shape analysis algorithms and 2D computational geometry, which can also be effectively utilized in the fields of natural sciences and remote sensing.
Polygon shape analysis is a crucial aspect of computational geometry, involving the study of the properties and characteristics of polygonal shapes in a two-dimensional space. Polygons, which are closed, flat shapes with straight sides, can vary greatly in complexity and form. Understanding their shapes is essential for numerous applications, including computer graphics, geographical information systems (GIS), and robotics.
COCOJSON format for representing 2D polygons
The initial step in polygon shape analysis often involves defining the vertices and edges of a polygon. Vertices are the points where two edges meet, and edges are the straight lines connecting these points. By analyzing the arrangement and lengths of these edges and vertices, one can derive various properties of the polygon, such as its perimeter, area, and internal angles.
In 2D computational geometry, polygons can be represented in various ways.
A common method is to use a pair of 2 lists, one for all points X and another for all points Y.
Another approach is to concatenate all X and Y coordinates into a single matrix.
For instance, in COCOJSON, the points of each polygon are listed in a one-dimensional array in the order of (x, y).
The pseudo code is
"segmentation": [vertex1, vertex2, vertex3, ...]
Polygon roughness refers to the degree of irregularity or complexity of a polygon's boundary. Evaluating polygon roughness is important in fields like materials science, where surface texture analysis is critical, and in computer graphics, where it affects rendering techniques.
For example, the roughness of a Ni electrode significantly impacts the reliability of MLCCs, making computer analysis of the electrode's shape crucial for the manufacturing and quality inspection of MLCCs. For more details, please refer to our previously published article.
https://www.deepblock.net/blog/the-role-of-ligament-structure-in-mlcc-electrodes
Techniques for evaluating roughness include measuring the deviation of the polygon's edges from a smooth reference shape, such as a circle or an ellipse. Another approach is to calculate the polygon's fractal dimension, which quantifies how the detail in the polygon's shape changes with scale.
And here are other well-known algorithms for evaluating roughness:
Peak-to-Valley Roughness (Rv): This measures the difference between the highest peak and the lowest valley within a given section.
Skewness and Kurtosis: These higher-order statistical measures assess the symmetry and sharpness of surface features, offering additional insights into the roughness profile.
Power Spectral Density (PSD): In this frequency-based roughness measurement, the surface is analyzed in the frequency domain, where roughness is defined by the amplitude of surface features at different spatial frequencies.
There are several methods for quantifying polygon roughness, each offering unique insights into the complexity and irregularity of polygonal shapes. One common and widely used method is the Perimeter-Area Ratio (PAR). This technique involves calculating the ratio of the polygon's perimeter to its area, providing a straightforward metric for assessing shape complexity. A higher PAR value suggests that the polygon has a more intricate and irregular boundary, indicating a rougher shape. This method is particularly useful in applications where a quick assessment of shape complexity is needed, such as in computer graphics and geographical information systems.
Another effective method for evaluating polygon roughness is the Mean Squared Error (MSE) approach. This technique involves comparing the actual boundary of the polygon to a fitted smooth curve, such as a circle or an ellipse, which serves as a reference for an ideal smooth shape. By calculating the MSE, one can quantify the degree of deviation of the polygon's boundary from this ideal shape. A higher MSE value indicates that the polygon's boundary is more irregular and deviates significantly from the smooth reference, thus reflecting greater roughness. This method is particularly valuable in fields like materials science, where precise measurements of surface texture are crucial for quality control and analysis.
The concept of fractal dimension is a mathematical tool used to describe the complexity and intricacy of self-similar structures, which are patterns that repeat at different scales. This concept can be effectively applied to polygons to measure their roughness and complexity. By calculating the fractal dimension of a polygon, one can quantify how the level of detail in the polygon's shape changes as the scale of observation varies. This provides a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of the polygon's roughness compared to traditional methods that might only consider basic geometric properties.
Local roughness calculation, on the other hand, involves a more focused approach by analyzing smaller, discrete segments of the polygon's boundary. This method assesses variations in roughness along these segments, which can reveal localized irregularities that might not be apparent when considering the polygon as a whole. By breaking down the boundary into smaller parts, local roughness calculation provides a more detailed and granular roughness profile.